Ron Miller is an attorney who focuses on serious injury and wrongful death cases involving motor vehicle collisions, medical malpractice, and products and premises liability. If you are looking for a Maryland personal injury attorney for your case, call him today at 800-553-8082.

On Saturday, the New York Times published an informative article on trucking industry deregulation. If you are a truck accident lawyer in Maryland or elsewhere, I would suggest reading the entire article. Here are some highlights:

*In 1937, Congress set the first driving hour limits. Truckers could drive up to 10 continuous hours but were required to rest for a minimum of 8 hours. They could use the remaining six hours for other work activities, like loading, or for breaks or meals. Truckers could drive up to 60 hours over 7 consecutive days, or 70 hours over 8 days. To enforce those rules, the government required drivers to keep logs.

*In 1999, Congress created the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration in response to what lawmakers considered ineffectual regulation and high casualties. A year later, the agency proposed tighter service hour rules. They would allow long-haul drivers to work a maximum of 12 hours a day and require them to take 10-hour breaks between shifts. They also required installation of electronic devices to replace driver logs.

*In April 2003, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration reversed gears and issued rules that increased the maximum driving hours to 77 from 60, over 7 consecutive days, and to 88 hours from 70, over 8 consecutive days. The new rules capped daily work hours at 14, which included driving and waiting for loading and unloading. The Agency also decided not to require truck companies to install electronic monitoring devices.

*During the 2000 election cycle, trucking executives and political action committees gave more than $4.3 million in donations to the Republicans and less than $1 million to Democrats. From 2000 to 2006, the trucking industry directed more than $14 million in campaign contributions to Republicans.

*The trucking industry’s donations and lobbying fees – about $37 million from 2000 to 2005 – led to rules that have saved what industry officials estimate are billions of dollars in expenses linked to tougher trucking regulations.

*The fatality rate for truck-related accidents remains nearly double that involving only cars (according to safety experts).

*The practice of falsifying truck driver hours is an open secret in the trucking industry; truckers routinely refer to their logs as “comic books.” Fines are small and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration does not have enough staff to monitor 700,000 businesses and almost eight million trucks.

The article then tells the story of a truck driver from Virginia who claims to have been taught to conceal excessive driving hours in his truck during his training last January by his former employer, Boyd Brothers Transportation of Birmingham, Alabama. The truck driver said his orientation instructor at Boyd Brothers told his class that government inspectors were allowed to examine a monthly logbook if it was bound, but taught the truck drivers a back door. If they removed the staples, government inspectors considered the trucking log “loose leaf” and they could require an examination of only pages from the most recent seven days.

To keep inspectors off the trail, the truck driver alleged that the drivers were told to use fuel credit cards that recorded only the date, not the time, of the fuel stop. He added that the trucking company he worked for pushed him to work longer hours than permitted and that his logbooks were “adjusted” frequently to appear as if the truck driver was within the legal limits. He said he told a dispatcher several times he was too tired to make another trip, but he was still ordered to do so after just a few hours of sleep. Continue reading

A Jury Verdict Research study found that the median compensatory award for personal injury trials in Minnesota is $32,468. To the delight of Minnesota personal injury lawyers, the study also found that plaintiffs recovered damages in 67% of personal injury cases that go to trial. Both statistics are higher than those in Maryland. The median compensatory award in personal injury trials in Maryland is $12,813. Specifically, in auto accident cases in Maryland, the median verdict is $11,277. This data is arguably misleading. Many small claim type cases find their way to Maryland juries because defense lawyers in personal injury cases in Maryland can remove cases to Circuit Court if the plaintiff seeks more than $10,000 (but less than $25,000, which qualifies it for District Court), which they frequently do, primarily to increase the burden on Maryland personal injury lawyers.

The journal Spine has published an article questioning implanted hardware use in spinal fusion surgeries for back problems. The Spine study found that the implantation of hardware does not improve results. The authors also determined that the hardware carries a higher risk of complications, including infections which can occur more readily and can also be harder to see because the hardware can block a clear radiological view of the spine.

spinal fusion surgery

Decisions about surgery are tough on any patient

The hardware surviving over time is another problem.  When screws, plates, or rods break, the results can push right on a nerve and cause significant pain.

Frequently, insurance adjusters, plaintiffs’ personal injury lawyers, and defense lawyers confuse two important concepts when a defendant driver is using someone else’s vehicle: permissive use vs. negligent entrustment. I had an adjuster confuse the two last months during settlement negotiations so I thought I would write today about the differences between these two concepts under Maryland law.

Permissive Use

Permissive use refers to whether or not the driver of a vehicle had the permission (either express or implied) of the vehicle’s owner at the time of the crash. Whether the driver had the owner’s permission is an issue that affects whether the owner’s insurance company will provide insurance coverage to the driver. This issue rarely affects who should be a defendant in a claim (but may affect who has coverage for the accident).

I heard on the radio yesterday that there are four times more fatal auto accidents from drunk driving on Halloween as there are on New Year’s Eve. While statistics do not support this, drunk driving crashes cause more fatalities during Halloween than the New Year’s holiday. Four out of ten accidents today will be alcohol-related. Moral of the story: be safe and keep your kids safe tonight.

Last week, a Baltimore County jury awarded a $2.3 million jury verdict in a stroke misdiagnosis medical malpractice suit in Towson.

The trial before Baltimore County Circuit Court Judge Dana M. Levitz took six days, and the jury deliberated for seven hours before returning a verdict, according to Plaintiff’s medical malpractice lawyer.

Facts

Yesterday’s USA Today ran a story about the often preventable tragedy of undiagnosed heart attacks. It told the story of James Pettry, who woke early one morning short of breath and sweating profusely. His wife dialed 911. The paramedics gave Mr. Pettry oxygen and aspirin and then used an electrocardiogram machine to examine the heart’s electrical function. They believed he had a heart attack and took him 3 miles to the hospital. The emergency room doctor disagreed. The doctor ran some tests, diagnosed him with anxiety, and sent Mr. Pettry home nearly five hours later.

We all know where this story is going. Mr. Pettry died the next day, joining the list of thousands every year who die every year from heart attacks left undetected. In fact, researchers from New England Medical Center in Boston reported in the New England Journal of Medicine in April 2000 that emergency room doctors mistakenly send home one in 50 heart attack victims. Other studies have documented higher rates of missed heart attack diagnosis.

The defendant says that his patient died from chronic heart disease that had no connection to the symptoms that landed him in the ER.

More and more personal injury lawyers in Maryland accident cases are doing battle over the ‘independent’ medical examination. Attorneys argue over everything from who should conduct the examination, how far the plaintiff should have a drive for the examination, to more substantive issues such as the examining doctor’s financial records. However, one thing that plaintiff personal injury lawyers sometimes overlook is the fact that their client may have already had such a medical examination before they even became involved in the case if the case involves an uninsured motorist or used PIP coverage.

Most insurance policies have a provision whereby the insurance company can ask for the policyholder to attend a medical examination with a physician of its choosing before the insured receives payments. This is can be used as a condition precedent to any insured receiving PIP benefits or uninsured motorist benefits. Does Maryland law allow it? No one really knows for sure.

The Maryland accident lawyer must be careful where PIP has already been paid or where uninsured motorist coverage applies. Often, the insurance claims adjuster has a copy of the report compiled by the insurance company’s doctor months or even years before it must be disclosed to the plaintiff’s lawyer (for example, before a suit has been filed or before discovery answers are due).

More often than ever before, our lawyers are having difficultly getting timely answers to discovery from defense lawyers. I do not think this is some nefarious plot. Rather, I think defense lawyers are used to answering discovery whenever they feel like it because no one holds their feet to the fire.

As a matter of practice, attorneys should send out a letter as soon as the discovery is late. Not to be difficult for the sake of being difficult but to make sure that the lawyer has complied with Maryland Rule 2-431, which does not allow the filing of discovery motions until there has been attempts to resolve it and a certificate under the rule accompanies the motion). What I see happening is that lawyers let discovery failures go and when they finally realize there is a problem, they have not complied with the letter or spirit of Maryland Rule 2-431.

I think judges are becoming more serious about the spirit of Maryland Rule 2-431 in trying to resolve discovery disputes. I attached one letter that requested discovery in a motion to compel in a Prince George’s County wrongful death/survival action case and the motions judge’s law clerk called me to ask if this was the only letter I had written. Fortunately, I had written several letters. But the point is lawyers in Maryland really need to push the opposing lawyer for discovery as opposed to writing a single form letter and then filing a motion.

The cap on pain and suffering damages in Maryland for claims arising after today has increased to $680,000. This is also the maximum cap on any non-medical malpractice wrongful death case if there is only one claimant. The wrongful death cap with two or more beneficiaries in a non-medical malpractice case is now $1,020,000.

The pain and suffering cap in Maryland in medical malpractice cases as the result of a bill that the General Assembly passed last year remains at $650,000. This is also the maximum cap on medical malpractice wrongful death cases if there is only one claimant. The wrongful death cap with two or more beneficiaries in medical malpractice cases that arise after today is $812,500.

Contact Information